This is particularly apt when working with oneoff specialty cpus in environments where all software costs are likely to be considered overhead, with minimal expectations that others will use the resulting compiler. The gnu affero general public license3 agpl is a special license in the family of open source licenses, creating risks and opportunities that do not exist with most other open source licenses. You can charge nothing, a penny, a dollar, or a billion dollars. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law center. However, i wonder how to do it concretely because a passage in the x11 license bothers me. As the free software foundation states, dynamically linking application to libraries creates a single work derived from both the library code and the application code.
The software freedom law center sflc has prepared this document for developers who wish to incorporate permissivelicensed 1 code into gpld projects. If i modify code that is dual licensed under the gpl and an. Is it possible to alter the code of the chili plugin, which had its latest release on july 2008, and it is licensed under the mit license, to then license it under gpl. As far i can see, there is no restriction about the new code being licensed under the same license. The gpl faq has this to say on keeping your modifications private. Gpl advantages and disadvantages a common reason to use the gpl is when modifying or extending the gcc compiler.
Since youre making a derivative work of gpl licensed software, your combined work would need to be licensed under the gpl as a whole. Jun 30, 2012 by only allowing software they approve to run, they can protect us. The following is a humanreadable summary of the license, and is not a substitute for the full legal license. If software is licenced under a gpl license, can it be used without restriction in a corporatecommercial environment. Marco fioretti answers a techrepublic members questions about charging fees for software thats made available under the gnu gpl license version 2 or 3. Can you change code distributed under the mit license, and re. Both are licensed under the gpl and i downloaded them direct from the project web site links via sourceforge. If you have feedback on this document, or any oss watch activity, please send it to. So that means you have to give everyone else the same rights as you got. Ive seen rare cases where the licensor explicitly stipulates a dual license to mean both apply simultaneously. A 100% free software product is a product which contains no proprietary software, includes products entire source code somewhere on the system, and all such source code is licensed under a free software license. Furthermore, the gpl states that such software can be freely copied, shared, and.
The purpose of this license is to ensure that a work can be freely distributed and modified by anybody, and that no proprietary works can be derived from the original work. Most gpl version 2 software is actually licensed as gpl version 2 or any later version, or. Mozilla relicensed from the mpl to a triplelicensed mplgpllgpl scheme. Software licensed under the gnu general public license is free software, and all software that builds on gpllicensed components is also free and must also be licensed under the gpl. If im using a library that is licensed under gpl v3 in my project, can i license my project under the mit license. I already searched the site, but i could only find answers relating to using gpl libraries in software that people were going to selldistribute. Can you distribute software under gpl v3 and require users. I have, however, come to the conclusion that software licensed under the gpl is far from free software. So, these are ten of your top gpl license questions answered.
Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the provenance and openness of the software. This post takes a look at the legal issues raised by both cases and what they mean for foss producers and users. I do not edit the source code of the gpl software, just using it. It is therefore often thought that gpllicensed software is unsuitable for proprietary projects. If your software is licensed under the terms of the gpl, it is free. This faq attempts to provide answers to commonly asked questions related to the eclipse public license 1. The gpl is considered the standard open source software licence, and many nonsoftware works are published under the gpl as well. The gnu general public license is available in these formats. We dont want a machine that only runs software approved by them our computers should always run only software approved by us. If your software includes gpl software, there is a strong likelihood that you are obligated by the terms of the gpl to license your code under the same gpl license. If an application links to a library licensed under gpl, it must also be licensed under gpl.
Wikimedia commons has media related to free software under the gpl. Differences between gpl and lgpl when using licensed software. The gpl is the free software foundations general public licence. Explaining and understanding the gnu general public license. Openfoam is distributed by the openfoam foundation and is freely available and open source, licensed under the gnu general public licence. A copy of that license is included in this document on page x. Jun 29, 2007 the gnu general public license is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works. License the proposed change often in the form of a pull request is licensed under the same terms as the project itself e. Licenses libreoffice free office suite fun project. A software license is a legal instrument governing the use or redistribution of software. Using full gpl libraries in software as a service saas models. You should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program. Can gpl software be bought by a company and still released. This article by jerry epplin sheds some light on the issues associated with using gpl software in embedded applications, and attempts to dispel the.
The gpl requires that any derivative work of gpl licensed code must also be licensed under the gpl if it is. Apples itunes store terms of service at odds with gpl. Gnu general public license version 2 open source initiative. If he conveys software that contains modified or unmodified components that are licensed in under the gpl, his own product is also subject to the gpl. The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. When providing a license for your product, you dont simply say.
We normally use the gnu general public license gnu gpl, specifying version 3 or any later version, but occasionally we use other free software licenses. There are multiple variants of the gnu gpl, each with different requirements. Accounts 531995 to 531999 are available for departments to further breakdown computing supplies. Im going to report an argument that microsoft has made about the gpl, and the basic conclusion of this argument is that gpl software, the software licensed under the free software foundations new gpl license, should not be supported as part of the ecosystem, at least when it comes to government. Using full gpl libraries in software as a service saas. Under united states law, all software is protected, in both source code and object code forms, unless that software was developed by the united states government, in which case it cannot be ed. Most newly written free software licenses since the late 1990s include some form of patent retaliation clauses. I am writing software licensed under mit and including gpl. However, free here does not essentially mean freewareit can also be a paid software. Libreoffice is made available subject to the terms of the mozilla public license v2.
Indeed, by revenue and community size the most successful free open source software remains that under the gpl, such as linux, due to its ecosystem generating nature. Whats the case when using software licensed under gpl or lgpl. This is my own code and i can use any license i please. If the library as you received it specifies that a certain numbered version of the gnu lesser general public license or any later version applies to it, you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that published version or of any later version published by the free software foundation.
Historically, relicensing of software without explicit approval from all contributors has been done before, under the advice of legal professionals. This claim ignores the fact that we need protection from them. The gnu gpl is a software license agreement, under which parts of the android operating system are licensed. Html, plain text, odf, docbook v4 or v5, texinfo, latex, markdown, and rtf. The software is duallicensed, and you can choose whichever license you want. It is based on code from apache openoffice made available under the apache license 2. These measures stipulate that ones rights under the license such as to redistribution, may be terminated if one attempts to enforce patents relating to the licensed software, under certain circumstances. Note that for 100% free software products, the submission requirements are much simpler.
We may choose to trust someone else to help us make those approval decisions, but we. Gephi dual license header and license notice the gephi consortium elects to use only the gnu general public license version 3 gpl for any software where a choice of gpl license versions are made available with the language indicating that gplv3 or any later version may be used, or where a choice of which version of the gpl is applied is unspecified. Recently, i downloaded two fairly popular pieces of foss software. Gnu general public license version 3 gnu general public license v2. Gnu general public license this license, commonly known as the gpl, has two versions that are actively and widely used in many open source communities. The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to none unlicense. Qgis is a user friendly open source geographic information system gis. Media in category free software under the gpl the following 17 files are in this category, out of 17 total. However, the legal mechanics of it are unclear and have never been tested in court. The software that i am refering to is qgis which provides this description. See the gnu general public license for more details. The majority of android is licensed under the apache. Prominent freesoftware programs licensed under the gpl include the linux kernel and the gnu compiler collection gcc. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law.
I created a software that is made from sources licensed x11 and i wanna put my software under gnu gpl. I tried to read the gpl v3 text but i cannot understand it without your assistance. Maintaining permissivelicensed files in a gpllicensed. Apr 14, 2016 if your software includes gpl software, there is a strong likelihood that you are obligated by the terms of the gpl to license your code under the same gpl license. Software freedom law center guide to gpl compliance 2nd edition.
Can gpl licenced software be used in corporate environments. The gnu gpl is the most widely used free software license and has a strong copyleft requirement. The reason for this choice in licensing is to ensure that everyone can use gstreamer to build applications using licenses of their choice. Yes my application is closed source free software but at least if i only need to make the external exe as open source and not. I used to release everything i wrote under the gpl without thinking about it too much.
Highlights from my left 4 dead 2 stream on the 28th of december, 2018. Artoolkit is made available under a duallicense model. The first version of the affero general public license agplv1, was published by affero, inc. One example is mozillas trilicense, which states that the software is released under the mpl, but the user can also choose gpl or lgpl instead of mpl i think this is because the mpl license is incompatible with the gpl license. When versata software sued ameriprise financial services for breaching its software license, it unwittingly unearthed a gpl violation of its own and touched off another lawsuit that could prove to be a leading case on free and open source software licensing. Ianal, but it is pretty clear that this license would fall apart if the owner attempted to enforce it. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a programto make sure it remains free software for all its users.
Lessor gpl there are reasons that can make it better to use the lesser gpl in certain cases. It means that the source code of the application must be provided. I have licensed every piece of software i have ever written under the gpl, i have been an active financial supporter of the free software foundation and software freedom conservancy and the work they do, and i advocate for the usage of the gpl. General public license gnu gpl has no requirements about how much you can charge for distributing a copy of free software. The affero general public license affero gpl and informally affero license is a free software license.
Gstreamer licensing how to license the code you write for gstreamer. The artoolkit license model university of washington. Is it really so, or is there a minimum number of changes. Gstreamer is a pluginbased framework licensed under the lgpl. Authors of ed software can donate their software to the public domain, in which case it is also not covered by and, as a result, cannot be licensed. And the licensee may modify the software or use it in his own projects. Aug 26, 2008 the software included in this product contains ed software that is licensed under the gpl. The software included in this product contains ed software that is licensed under the gpl. Publications maintaining permissivelicensed files in a gpllicensed project. The meaning of under dual has not been understood though i understood the content of an individual license. Gnu general public license, version 3 spdx short identifier.
Gpl software certification program free software foundation. The licensee may redistribute the software without any changes under the gnu gpl. The differences between the gpl, lgpl and the bsd fosswire. If the library as you received it specifies that a certain numbered version of the gnu lesser general public license or any later version applies to it, you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that published version or of any later version published by.
How to put a software under gnu gpl code with portions licensed x11 mit closed. You may obtain the complete corresponding source code from us for a period of three years after our last shipment of this product, which will be no earlier than 20110801, by sending. Oct 31, 2014 the organizations traditionally bringing complaints of copyleft noncompliance in historical order, the free software foundation, gpl, the software freedom law center, and the software freedom conservancy all fully investigate and verify complaints referred to them before making contact with apparently noncomplying parties. Ive developed an php content management system cms and use some linux executables licensed under gpl or lgpl in my cms to accomplish various tasks like image editing. As a result, new releases of all my software autorpm, logwatch, etc. Those terms require that any software created as a derivative of code under the gpl also be licensed under the gpl. If you have licensed software youve written under gpl version 2, and you are the original licensor of that software, you may wish to relicense your software under gpl version 3. I was dismayed to find that one contained embedded. Lawsuit threatens to break new ground on the gpl and software. Nov 10, 2005 the gnu general public license v2 an overview by rowan wilson is licensed under a creative commons attributionsharealike 4. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a. This project aims to establish a new graphical quality level for the game as a whole. Free software foundation recommendations for free operating. Nov 02, 2016 gpl, or the gnu general public license, is an open source license meant for software.
Under the agpl, the developer must release the modified version of the program to everyone who uses the service. Some days ago, in the local spanish wordpress slack, i kept an interesting conversation about if a wordpress plugin, licensed under the gplv2, may include a piece of code that disables the plugin, totally or partially, if a valid activation code is not entered in the plugin configuration backend. Lawsuit threatens to break new ground on the gpl and. Can you license under the gpl a software requiring. Handbrake documentation this work is licensed under the creative commons attributionsharealike 4. Version 3 of the gpl added protections against use with software locking. May 04, 2019 in most cases when open source code is licensed under two licenses, the licensee gets to select which one applies to their use.
There are two main elements to the gpl, designed to prevent open source software being exploited by their inclusion within nonfree, closed sourced software. However, if you dont want to distribute your work, you are in no way compelled to shared your changes. However, i came across projects released under both the gpl license and the mit license. Pages in category software using the gpl license the following 150 pages are in this category, out of 150 total. Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail. Everything a government attorney needs to know about open. I know its possible, because gnu gpl is compatible with the x11 licence. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. Im selling the cms and also including the executables when i deliver the product.
The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the free software. Gpl license article about gpl license by the free dictionary. My comments here are not about the validity or the great value of the gplit is an unquestionably. To make it free software, you need to release it under a free software license. Historically, the gpl license family has been one of the most popular software licenses in the free and opensource software domain. Can gpl software be bought by a company and still released as gpl. As it has been since the first public release of version 1.
1031 453 1379 449 629 1039 1183 367 794 184 514 933 958 555 576 1073 1231 1127 1373 78 535 1220 1149 3 551 1392 17 783 1006 662 772 1421 1179 909 1046 1082 1128 1241